 |
 |
 |
|
Top News
Home |
WikiNews |
Finance |
Archive
Blogs:
New York
InstaPundit
PickTheBrain
Movies
WebTV
Access Hollywood
DailyKos
Interesting Thing of the Day
LifeHack
Dumb Little Man
TreeHugger
Random Good Stuff
Simply Recipes
BA.net feedsburner Consumerist News 01/05/2008
Subscribe with an RSS reader
News Home
Archive
Consumerist
Consumerist
read more
read more
Shoppers Bite Back.
This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site, subject to copyright and fair use.
-
FDA Believes Heparin Contamination Was Intentional [Tainted]
The New York Times
reports that the FDA is now working under the assumption that the
deadly contamination
of heparin was intentional. In her prepared testimony before a congressional subcommittee, Janet Woodcock, director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation said,
FDA's working hypothesis is that this was intentional contamination, but this has not been proven.
More details, inside...
The FDA discovered that the drug was contaminated with oversulfated condrotin sulfate, which mimics heparin, thus eluding routine tests. Baxter President Robert L. Parkinson Jr. said in his testimony that his company is "greatly concerned that our heparin product appears to be the target of a deliberate adulteration scheme." Additionally he said,
"The complexity of the global drug supply chain creates new and emerging risks that call for new ways of thinking about, identifying and addressing vulnerabilities, and that resting on old standards - even ones that have worked for decades - is no longer enough.
It should be interesting in the coming months to see whether this turns out to be another case of Chinese factories trying to save money or actually a case of malicious intent.
Heparin Contamination May Have Been Deliberate, F.D.A. Says
[New York Times]
FDA Official: Heparin Contamination May Have Been Intentional
[Fox News]
(Photo:
Getty
)
read more
China
Chinese factories
Heparin
tainted
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:49:19 EDT
Jay Slatkin
-
Disney Upset About Risque Hannah Montana Pics, Underaged Girls On Their Billboards In China [Whoops]
So Disney is all upset over some
slightly saucy photographs
of 15-year-old
Hannah Montana
star Miley Cyrus, but it seems in their haste to toss out accusations (Disney spokeswoman Patti McTeague told the
New York Times
that "a situation was created to deliberately manipulate a 15-year-old in order to sell magazines"), the company neglected to consider the appropriateness of using obviously under-aged girls on their underwear billboards in China.
From
Slate:
Reading McTeague's comment over coffee yesterday morning, I couldn't help but think of an advertisement I'd seen a few months ago while on a reporting trip to China. I was walking from my Beijing bed-and-breakfast to a nearby subway station when I was stopped in my tracks by a billboard that made the controversial 1990s Calvin Klein underwear ads look artistic by comparison. Staring down at the throngs of shoppers on Beijing's Xinjiekou Nandajie Avenue, a busy commercial thoroughfare about a mile west of the Forbidden City, was a white girl who looked all of 12, reclining in a matching bra-and-panties set adorned with Disney's signature mouse-ear design. In a particularly creepy detail, the pigtailed child was playing with a pair of Minnie Mouse hand puppets. In the upper left-hand corner was the familiar script of the Disney logo.
Not believing my eyes, and on an assignment that touched on images of Westerners in the Chinese consumer's imagination, I snapped a photo:
After reading of the Cyrus flap, I e-mailed my photo to Disney's McTeague. I was curious: How did the company square its position on the Liebowitz photo with its risqué billboard in China?
McTeague passed on commenting and forwarded the image to Gary Foster, a spokesman for Disney's consumer-products division. He called me from a business trip (to China) to disavow the ad. "It has caught us totally by surprise," Foster told me by phone from Guangzhou. He explained that Disney contracts with a host of licensees, who produce and market products for the Disney brand. Foster said that licensees are contractually bound to clear all advertising with Disney's corporate offices. "We have literally hundreds of licensees making our products. They are supposed to submit any kind of imagery to us before it is used, but it's hard to enforce that sometimes," he said.
Disney responded by pulling the billboard. Whoops.
Mickey Mouse Operation
[Slate]
(Photo:
Daniel Brook
)
read more
Badvertising
China
Disney
Miley Cyrus
Whoops
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:42:18 EDT
Meg Marco
-
Dunkin' Donuts Suing Its Own Small Franchisees Out Of Existence [Bad Company]
If your favorite Dunkin' Donuts shop is an individually-owned franchise and not part of a large group of stores, don't grow too attached to it, warns Cindy Gluck, a DD owner in Brooklyn. She claims DD corporate waits patiently for smaller franchisees to make any mistake at all, then
strong-arms them out of business at a huge financial loss
. The sheer number of lawsuits DD has aimed at small-time owners recently indicates that something unusual is going on:
Dunkin' Donuts has sued other franchise owners 154 times since 2006. Over the same stretch of time, McDonald's was involved in five lawsuits. And Subway, a company that has four times the number of locations as Dunkin' Donuts, sued its franchises 12 times.
Why would they do something so apparently self-destructive? Because the company's larger business strategy requires bigger franchisees who can open lots of stores rapidly to compete with Starbucks, and it's too expensive to buy out the small owners any other way. She and her business partner are currently being forced out of business for this very reason, even though their two Brooklyn-based stores are doing fine.
Gluck's mistake was offering to sell a 15% stake in her company to a store manager. She told Dunkin' Donuts about this beforehand to make sure it was okay. It turns out it wasn't. In fact, even though she immediately withdrew the offer, Dunkin' Donuts has threatened a lawsuit against her and her business partner unless they sell DD corporate their two stores for half of what they're worth
and
pay a $100,000 penalty fee.
The consequences of this are real, personal and painful. The owners of these stores - who overwhelmingly tend to be immigrants - lose their entire life's work.
Maybe America runs on Dunkin', but Dunkin' itself is a corporate giant that runs on the sweat of franchisees large and small.
We small franchisees have just about been sweated out.
"Dunkin' Donuts business practices have lots of holes"
[New York Daily News]
(Thanks to Rob!)
(Photo:
Consumerist
)
|
Top |
Arts |
Business |
Computers |
Games |
Health |
Kids |
News |
Recreation |
Reference |
Regional |
Science |
Shopping |
Society |
Sports |
World |
Languages |
News |
Blogs
BA.net Brujula.Net © 2008
advertising
english
español
italiano
germany
japan
france
more
bookmark
|
|
 |
 |